04/07/2010
outfit - but in off white/silver
outfit - but in off white/silver
necklace1
necklace2
necklace3
necklace4
outfit - but in off white/silvernecklace1necklace2necklace3necklace4
  

Wedding Rings And Jewelry
HERE WE GO AGAIN! Please help!

Hi girls, Indecision queen is back :::sheepish smile:::

BUT I have a reason for looking for new jewelry! TWO actually lol

1) The Etsy seller emailed and said the necklace you girls picked last time had gotten complaints and she didn't want to sell me imperfect merchandise

and

2) I changed my outfit. ALOT. Instead of a v-neck of white and antique silver outfit, my outfit is now off white, sweetheart neck and crystal and brighter silver work.. The neck is the biggest change, there is now a whole lotta neck showing lol.

So help me with any of these that you like, or am I to continue looking?

I will break these down for you a little:

1) Really pretty, more bridal than I would normally pick but I love the pearls and the work will match the outfit. And very very reasonably priced

2) I loooooooooove BUT it's super pricey and also, I am afraid it may be a bit big for little me..

3) Very pretty and will definitely match the dress. Not cheap but gorgeous but I really do love pearls... On the pricey side as well

4) I do definitely love this. Also worried about this because it is from an Etsy seller in Australia. Also, the chain at the back of the necklace seems to dress it down a bit to me. What do you girls think if it.. On the pricey side

Last pic is the outfit similar to mine. Mine will be off white, silver, crystals though. Corset, sweetheart neckline etc.

Also keep in mind, I am a shortie and not to be insulting, but I do have a wider neck lol. I have realized chokers don't suit me too well, especially a chunky one!

With that said, I can't wait to see your votes! Thank you - for the third time - for you help ladies lolololol
hamptonsbabe's Orange wedding
 |  Randolph, NJ, USA  |  04/07/2010  | 
#3 has my vote- glam, but not overbearing. Goes down in a v-shape, so not exactly choker style.

#1, then #4... just classy pieces.

I avoided #2 even though it's really gorgeous,,,cause if you have a small frame- that's a lot to carry off.

Hope that helps!

Your outfit seems so unique & beautiful!
netter's Pink wedding
 |  Toronto, ON, Canada  |  04/07/2010  | 
I love # 1.. actually i BEYOND LOVE #1.. I am drooling over it..
honeybee's Purple wedding
 |  Brandon, MS, USA  |  04/07/2010  | 
Although you claim #1 is the least expensive ;-) I like it most of all! It seems to capture a little bit of everything you like in the other pieces, and it is gorgeous! This was an easy pick for me.
netter's Pink wedding
 |  Toronto, ON, Canada  |  04/07/2010  | 
seriously tash.. I keep coming back to look at number 1 lol.. great find!!
jerseygirl826's Red wedding
 |  Middletown, NJ, USA  |  04/07/2010  | 
I am liking #2 and #3...If I had to pick I would go with # bc of the way it comes down a little and it is not so much of a choker necklance look....I want to know what you decide to wear.....good luck!!
jerseygirl826's Red wedding
 |  Middletown, NJ, USA  |  04/07/2010  | 
I meant go with #3 lol
tashasita's Purple wedding
 |  Ottawa, ON, Canada  |  04/07/2010  | 
Thanks girls!! You rock with your comments and picks! I love them all, this is so hard but hamptonsbabe I may have to eliminate #2 for the mere size factor! But oh how it calls me! Why am I such a shrimp?! Lolol

netter, seriously, it is really reasonable! Want the info? It's at work but I will email you tomorrow with it! But bidding for the set starts under $20!!!! Crazy!

Honeybee, maybe my champagne taste can take a break on this one is what you're saying?! Lol

jerseygirl, thanks hon! I like #3 alot and of course, will meet the crazy Indian bling standards lolol! But so torn cuz I sooooo love pearls!!!
fijipearl's Red wedding
 |  Fort worth, TX, USA  |  04/07/2010  | 
#1 - I LIKE IT

#2 - too much

#3 - I LOVE IT

#4 - Australia?! No Ma'am. The chain does cheapen the rest of the necklace.
tashasita's Purple wedding
 |  Kanata, ON, Canada  |  04/07/2010  | 
Ha ha thanks fijipearl. I love the breakdown! You rock.
tashasita's Purple wedding
 |  Kanata, ON, Canada  |  04/07/2010  | 
Thanks for talking me out of #2 too girls - it is PRICEY!

And yeah, I agree on the chain of #4. Would you like it better if that could be changed fijipearl? Or it's still just not working for you?
's  wedding
tobemrsnuss
 |  Athens, GA, USA  |  04/07/2010  | 
It's great to see everything is taking shape. My vote goes to #1 and #3, both are gorgeous, liked #3 little more than #1.
Have Fun!!
BTW- Dress is stunning, can't wait to see you in this dress.
tashasita's Purple wedding
 |  Kanata, ON, Canada  |  04/07/2010  | 
Why hello Mrs. Nuss!! How are you darling?! Hope all is well in your newlywed world! We miss you on here! :) Thank you for stopping by to comment! :) Great to hear from you!!
gorgeous6's Pink wedding
 |  Houston, TX, USA  |  04/07/2010  | 
Tashasita, I love 3 and 4!!!!
tashasita's Purple wedding
 |  Hamilton, ON, Canada  |  04/08/2010  | 
Thanks gorgeous6! :) I'm adding up the votes lol
's  wedding
Nidhal
 |  Los angeles, CA, USA  |  04/08/2010  | 
OMGosh! #2!2!2!2!2!

I love it so much! I know it's pricey...sorry. I am in love with it. I want it too :) hehe. And I love the earrings too!! I think you could carry it!
tashasita's Purple wedding
 |  Montreal, QC, Canada  |  04/09/2010  | 
Awwww man!! You know I love your taste Nidhal!! You really think one of us five footas can carry that?! I gotta be honest, it's the only one that made me almost squeal I love it so much!! Alas I think I still have to keep looking. It's 2 times my budget and a bunch of things have come up in the last few days!! I gotta cut my budget rather than add to it... Sigh...
's  wedding
Nidhal
 |  San marcos, CA, USA  |  04/12/2010  | 
I understand :) I don't want to spend a fortune on jewelry either! But I think we could carry that baby off!!
see more
IMAG2637-1
I opened the box that the mailman left and all i could say is OMG!!!! I def made the right decisi...
 contact me    
 flag
number of visits: 211